What does empathy look like to you? Investigating student and staff opinions

Authors

  • Stephen George-Williams The University of Sydney https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2578-1187
  • Reyne Pullen The University of Sydney
  • Shane Wilkinson The University of Sydney
  • Erica Smith The University of New England

Keywords:

Questionnaires, Interviews, Affective Domain, General Sciences, Student/Staff Understanding

Abstract

Empathy is a key factor in successful human interaction. Many contemporary issues can be linked to a lack of ability for individuals to truly understand the perspectives of those that they interact with. In the context of teaching and learning, if teaching staff cannot truly understand the complex lives of their students, it is likely that students will be unable to reach their full potential and proceed into society as fully realised members of their respective communities (Levin et al., 2012; Robertson et al., 2015; Tudor, 1993). As such, any intervention that increases the ability of teaching staff to connect to the students, benefits not only the student but also the workforce they go on to contribute to (Haertel et al., 1981).

What is unknown, however, is how teaching staff perceive their role in this empathic relationship, especially in the sciences (chemistry, biology, physics, etc.). It is additionally unclear how these perceptions are affected by either subject area or the teaching staff’s previous teaching and life experience. This project would seek to interview teaching staff across a range of disciplines in order to unpack their views around empathy and how best to employ it in their teaching practices. Largescale questionaries undertaken with undergraduate students would allow a comparison between the perceptions of students with the teaching staff. Ideally, the results of this project would allow for a better understanding of how empathy can best be supported and embedded into the practices of teaching staff both within a university context but also into all teaching practices across society.

REFERENCES

Haertel, G. D., Walberg, H. J., & Haertel, E. H. (1981). Socio-psychological environments and learning: A quantitative synthesis. British Educational Research Journal, 7(1), 27-36.

Levin, D., Hammer, D., Elby, A., & Coffey, J. (2012). Becoming a responsive science teacher: Focusing on student thinking in secondary science. National Science Teachers Association Arlington, VA.

Robertson, A. D., Scherr, R., & Hammer, D. (2015). Responsive teaching in science and mathematics. Routledge.

Tudor, I. (1993). Teacher roles in the learner-centred classroom. ELT Journal, 47(1), 22-31.

 

Author Biographies

  • Stephen George-Williams, The University of Sydney

    Senior Lecturer (Chemistry, Education Focused)

  • Reyne Pullen, The University of Sydney
    Lecturer (Chemistry, Education Focused)
  • Shane Wilkinson, The University of Sydney
    Lecturer (Chemistry, Education Focused)
  • Erica Smith, The University of New England
    Associate Professor (Chemistry)

Downloads

Published

2022-09-23