"For if you think so highly of Middlemarch, then, to be consistent, you must be more qualified in your praise of the early things than persisting convention recognizes. Isn't there, in fact, a certain devaluing to be done?"
F. R. Leavis, The Great Tradition
Allowing that the strong autobiographical element in The Mill on the Floss is inseparable from "the vividness, the penetration, and the irresistible truth of the best of the book", Dr Leavis argues that it is responsible also for "disastrous weaknesses in George Eliot's handling of her themes",1 Following his habit of regarding any novel as somehow a test of the self-control of the writer behind it, he finds here an occasion of "that kind of direct presence of the author which has to be stigmatized as weakness" (p. 44), and an identification of George Eliot with Maggie Tulliver through which the author's intelligence is overwhelmed by her feelings. "When George Eliot touches on these given intensities of Maggie's inner life the vibration comes directly and simply from the novelist, precluding the presence of a maturer intelligence than Maggie's own" (p. 54).
The greatest admirer of The Mill on the Floss would concede its unevenness, as George Eliot herself did. Even in Middlemarch the St Theresa passages will coexist with the fine irony of the scene of Dorothea and Celia dividing the jewels. But is the presentation of Maggie Tulliver really so out of control?
The University of Sydney acknowledges that its campuses and facilities sit on the ancestral lands of Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander peoples, who have for thousands of generations exchanged knowledge for the benefit of all.
Learn more